Next Gen eDiscovery Law & Tech Blog
Skip to content
  • Home
  • ABOUT OUR BLOGGER
  • About X1
← Key Twitter Metadata Fields Lawyers and eDiscovery Professionals Need to Be Aware of
Next Gen eDiscovery Law & Tech Blog made it to Alltop →
October 11, 2011 · 10:06 AM
↓ Jump to Comments

Key Facebook Metadata Fields Lawyers and eDiscovery Professionals Need to be Aware of

Thank you to all for the response and excellent feedback on our previous post outlining key Twitter metadata fields. As promised, here are some key metadata fields for each Facebook entry. These fields provide important evidence, investigation context and circumstantial evidence to establish authenticity, if properly collected and preserved. Facebook changes their APIs from time to time, so we will be reporting any such changes and updates when they occur:

Metadata Field Description
Uri Unified resource identifier of the subject item
fb_item_type Identifies item as Wallitem, Newsitem, Photo, etc.
parent_itemnum Parent item number-sub item are tracked to parent
thread_id Unique identifier of a message thread
recipients All recipients of a message listed by name
recipients_id All recipients of a message listed by user id.
album_id Unique id number of a photo or video item
post_id Unique id number of a wall post
application application used to post to Facebook

(i.e, from an iPhone or social media client)

user_img url where user profile image is located
user_id Unique id of the poster/author of a Facebook item
account_id unique id of a users account
user_name display name of poster/author of a Facebook item
created_time When a post or message was created
updated_time When a post or message was revised/updated
To Name of user whom a wall post is directed to
to_id Unique id of user whom a wall post is directed to
Link url of any included links
comments_num Number of comments to a post
picture_url url where picture is located

As mentioned earlier, you will not get all this key metadata from a printout, screen capture, or even most compliance archive tools. Best practices technology specifically designed to collect, preserve, search and produce social media for eDiscovery is required.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Tweet (Opens in new window) Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Like Loading...

Related

6 Comments

Filed under Authentication, Preservation & Collection, Social Media Metadata

← Key Twitter Metadata Fields Lawyers and eDiscovery Professionals Need to Be Aware of
Next Gen eDiscovery Law & Tech Blog made it to Alltop →

6 responses to “Key Facebook Metadata Fields Lawyers and eDiscovery Professionals Need to be Aware of”

  1. Mary Jo Saul's avatar Mary Jo Saul
    January 1, 2014 at 8:52 PM

    Very useful information. Thank you. Mary Jo Saul, Firm Owner
    http://www.lareporters.com

    Reply
  2. Pingback: Metadata is Key to Getting the "Whole Truth" from Social Media

  3. Pingback: Top eDiscovery Trends for 2012: Tough to Find a List without Social Media - X1

  4. Pingback: Limitations of Facebook “Download Your Information” Feature for eDiscovery Preservation - X1

  5. Pingback: Facebook Download Your Information Function Omits Significant Amounts of Evidence - X1

  6. Pingback: Social Media: Highly Relevant, Clearly Discoverable but No Workable eDiscovery Workflow – Until Now - X1

Leave a reply to Mary Jo Saul Cancel reply

  • Blogger

    John Patzakis, Esq.

  • @patzakis

    Tweets by patzakis
  • @x1discovery

    Tweets by X1Discovery
  • Search this Blog

  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Blog Stats

    • 372,370 Visitors
  • Tags

    authenticate authentication Barry Murphy business case case law Cases cloud cloud-based data collect collection compliance data Data Discovery defensible discovery Distributed discovery e-discovery early case assessment ECA eDiscovery electronically stored information email enterprise Enterprise Search ESI evidence Facebook files FRCP GDPR Google IaaS Index-in-place information information governance Infrastructure as a Service investigation Investigations IT law enforcement law firm legal LegalTech LinkedIn litigation m365 metadata Microsoft preservation preserve productivity Relativity search security SharePoint Social Discovery social media social media evidence software Solution technology Twitter VDI virtualization Webinar Westlaw X1 X1 Discovery x1 enterprise X1 Enterprise Collect X1 Rapid Discovery X1 Search X1 Search 8 X1 Social Discovery
  • Blog Topics

    • Authentication (31)
    • Best Practices (144)
    • Business Productivity Search (12)
    • CaCPA (8)
    • Case Law (72)
    • Case Study (18)
    • Cloud Data (51)
    • collection (16)
    • Comliance (3)
    • compliance (24)
    • Corporations (42)
    • Cyber security (3)
    • Cybersecurity (6)
    • dark web (1)
    • Data Audit (23)
    • Desktop Search (20)
    • ECA (27)
    • eDiscovery (105)
    • eDiscovery & Compliance (71)
    • Enterprise eDiscovery (84)
    • Enterprise Search (28)
    • ESI (54)
    • GDPR (21)
    • Google Workspace (3)
    • Hybrid Search (14)
    • IaaS (9)
    • Information Access (17)
    • Information Governance (45)
    • Information Management (38)
    • law firm (26)
    • Legal Ethics & Social Media (9)
    • m365 (16)
    • Mobile Search (2)
    • MS Teams (12)
    • OneDrive (13)
    • Preservation & Collection (78)
    • productivity (5)
    • proportionality (14)
    • Records Management (11)
    • Relativity (5)
    • reviewing (1)
    • SaaS (4)
    • SharePoint (13)
    • SharePoint content (1)
    • Social Media Investigations (72)
    • Social Media Metadata (46)
    • Training and Certification (1)
    • Uncategorized (70)
    • VDI (1)
    • Virtualized Environment (10)
    • X1 Search 10 (1)
    • X1 Search 8 (3)
    • X1 Search 9 (3)
  • Popular Posts

    • Full Disk Imaging Not Required for eDiscovery Collections
    • 10 Unique and Compelling Features of X1 Social Discovery
    • Court Compels Forensic Imaging of Custodian Computer, Imposes Sanctions Due to Non-Defensible eDiscovery Preservation Process
  • Copyright

    © 2022 X1 Discovery, Inc. All Rights Reserved. X1 is not responsible for content published on Web sites accessible from this site or for content received from third parties.
Next Gen eDiscovery Law & Tech Blog · Legal and tech perspectives on eDiscovery, virtualization and enterprise search
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Comment
  • Reblog
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Next Gen eDiscovery Law & Tech Blog
    • Join 402 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Next Gen eDiscovery Law & Tech Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d